peering-toolbox:why-peer
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
peering-toolbox:why-peer [2022/08/18 17:05] – [The Importance of Peering] philip | peering-toolbox:why-peer [2023/04/30 14:30] (current) – [Costs] philip | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
===== Costs ===== | ===== Costs ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | (UPDATED) | ||
+ | |||
The commercial part of the Internet is highly competitive with many network operators vying to provide the highest quality service to their end users at the lowest possible cost. | The commercial part of the Internet is highly competitive with many network operators vying to provide the highest quality service to their end users at the lowest possible cost. | ||
Line 26: | Line 29: | ||
Peering has no traffic charges, and so the more peering an operator can achieve, the lower the cost of traffic charges paid for transit. This reduction in operating expenses (OpEx) means better value Internet access for customers, or more financial ability to invest in newer/ | Peering has no traffic charges, and so the more peering an operator can achieve, the lower the cost of traffic charges paid for transit. This reduction in operating expenses (OpEx) means better value Internet access for customers, or more financial ability to invest in newer/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Note**: in some parts of the Internet it is actually cheaper to outsource peering by buying cheap transit. Quite often the operational overhead, the cost of ports and cross-connects, | ||
===== Latency ===== | ===== Latency ===== | ||
Line 33: | Line 38: | ||
From an end-user perspective, | From an end-user perspective, | ||
- | Quite often the path from the network operator through their transit provider may be more indirect than is possible if the operator is connected directly to the content provider themselves. Several Internet applications are latency sensitive (online games, e-sports etc), and so a good provider will be looking for all opportunities to improve the latency their customers are experiencing. | + | Quite often the path from the network operator through their transit provider may be more indirect than is possible if the operator is connected directly to the content provider themselves. Several Internet applications are latency sensitive (video conferencing, |
===== Service Quality ===== | ===== Service Quality ===== | ||
Line 49: | Line 54: | ||
They have built their own content distribution networks (using their own fibre optic infrastructure rather than buying transit) and regional data centres, with their goal being to get their content to their " | They have built their own content distribution networks (using their own fibre optic infrastructure rather than buying transit) and regional data centres, with their goal being to get their content to their " | ||
- | With these Hyperscale Content Providers present in so many places, network operators of all types work hard to ensure that they can peer directly with these content providers as close as they can to their own network infrastructure. Hauling data half way (or even a quarter of the way) around the world as was done in the 1990s and 2000s have now been replaced | + | With these Hyperscale Content Providers present in so many places, network operators of all types work hard to ensure that they can peer directly with these content providers as close as they can to their own network infrastructure. Hauling data half way (or even a quarter of the way) around the world, as was done in the 1990s and 2000s, was replaced |
- | Given around 80% of traffic of any operator | + | Given around 80% of traffic of any network access provider |
Line 61: | Line 66: | ||
Quite often the capacity available from the network operator through their transit provider might have limitations that the network operator hasn't anticipated or, if there is a rapid increase in usage, hasn't purchased. This results in reduced throughput, congestion, and packet loss. This reflects poorly on the network operator' | Quite often the capacity available from the network operator through their transit provider might have limitations that the network operator hasn't anticipated or, if there is a rapid increase in usage, hasn't purchased. This results in reduced throughput, congestion, and packet loss. This reflects poorly on the network operator' | ||
- | If the operator is peered directly with a content provider or other network operator, the capacity is usually provisioned over a direct cross-connect (fibre optic etc), with both entities being able to directly adjust capacity as required. | + | If the operator is peered directly with a content provider or other network operator, the capacity is usually provisioned over a direct cross-connect (fibre optic etc), with both entities being able to directly adjust capacity as required. |
===== Relationships ===== | ===== Relationships ===== |
peering-toolbox/why-peer.1660806333.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/08/18 17:05 by philip